Large Map
  • More Local Stories
Cranston assault leaves one man injured
Cranston assault leaves one man injured

Cranston are investigating a domestic assault of a man with a …

RI police to take unwanted drugs
RI police to take unwanted drugs

Rhode Island is making it easier for residents to safely rid …

Hundreds of flags fly at a Warwick park
Hundreds of flags fly at a Warwick park

It was a beautiful site at the Pawtuxet memorial park in …

NB fire leaves one fire fighter injured
NB fire leaves one fire fighter injured

Two people; one a fire fighter, were taken to the hospital with…

Carcieri still won't discuss 38 Studios
Carcieri still won't discuss 38 Studios

The former governor won't discuss the implosion of the $75 …

Advertisement

Prayer case not first of its kind

Two other cases resulted in very different rulings

Updated: Wednesday, 18 Jan 2012, 6:40 AM EST
Published : Wednesday, 18 Jan 2012, 5:34 AM EST

CRANSTON, RI (WPRI) - The prayer banner controversy at Cranston West is not the first time a religious display in a public building has lead to a legal challenge.

Two similar cases have occurred, each with very different rulings.

In 1962, a Ten Commandments monument was placed on the grounds of the Texas State Capitol. A homeless man, Thomas Van Orden, filed suit against Texas Governor Rick Perry. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the monument was "both religious and secular as displayed in a museum-like setting".

In the Cranston Banner ruling, Judge Ronald Lagueux cites the Van Orden decision that stated while the Texas monument on government property did not violate the constitution.

Judge Laguex also refers to a Kentucky case involving a Ten Commandments monument in front of the McCreary County courthouse.

On the same day as the Van Orden ruling, the high court voted against that Kentucky historical religious monument, citing the importance of government neutrality.

The Cranston School Committee has ten days from the date of the ruling to remove the banner, or move forward with an appeal.

A vote in this matter could come as early as next week.

Copyright WPRI 12


Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. Please comment on the subject of the story itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Keep it civil, folks!

Our commenting section is powered by IntenseDebate. If you registered for an account but didn't receive a verification e-mail, check your spam folder or click here for more information. For additional technical help, click here.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Site Tools