AP110418052889_20120228202807_JPG

(AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

  • Providence News
Senate passes school security secrecy bill
Senate allows school security secrecy

The Senate passed a bill on Tuesday that will allow education …

RI Senate approves Chafee's pick to lead EDC
Senate approves Chafee's pick for EDC

Rhode Island's Economic Development Corp. has a new leader …

Fmr. mayor running for Colo. governor
Fmr. mayor running for Colo. governor

A onetime Republican Senate candidate from Rhode Island says …

Providence startup Swipely secures $12M to aid expansion
Providence startup Swipely secures $12M

The payment processing company founded by one of the state’s …

Cops: Providence man sold 3,000 Ecstasy pills
Man detained, sold 3,000 Ecstasy pills

An area man has been placed in federal custody after police …

Advertisement

Table games on the November ballot

Court ruled to allow expanded gambling question

Updated: Friday, 24 Aug 2012, 8:38 AM EDT
Published : Friday, 24 Aug 2012, 8:38 AM EDT

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) – Voters will get a chance to weigh in on the ballot question of whether or not to allow table games to hit Rhode Island casinos.

A court ruled on Thursday to allow the question on whether expanded gambling will come to Newport Grand and Twin River Casinos.

In November, voters will make a decision but it may not be clear cut.

“Our feeling is that it would leave a cloud hanging over the constitutionality of the question that’s going to be put to the voters,” said William Devereaux, lawyer for the Narragansett Indian Tribe.

Devereaux lobbied to the Supreme Court to speed up an appeals process to keep the question off the ballot, which the court ruled against.

“It’s left unanswered if it’s constitutional. So now you’re going to have a lot of people spending a lot of money on the cloud of uncertainty surrounding the question,” said Chief Sachem Matthew Thomas of the Narragansett Indian Tribe.

The question is a balance of revenue versus the rights of the Indian Tribe.

With competition moving in right over the border, Chief Sachem Matthew Thomas said that time is running out.

“The state’s going to protect the golden goose, in the haste to protect that golden goose they are going to cook it. Massachusetts and Connecticut are going to come, and we are going to watch the ship sail into the sunset,” said Chief Thomas.

A hearing is scheduled for the end of August to discuss the constitutionality of the proposal.
 

Copyright WPRI 12


Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. Please comment on the subject of the story itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Keep it civil, folks!

Our commenting section is powered by IntenseDebate. If you registered for an account but didn't receive a verification e-mail, check your spam folder or click here for more information. For additional technical help, click here.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Site Tools