• Photo
James "Whitey" Bulger

This booking photograph, obtained by WBUR 90.9 - NPR Radio Boston, shows Boston mob boss James "Whitey" Bulger. (AP Photo/WBUR 90.9)

  • More Crime News
Photos: May 2013 Mugshots
Photos: May 2013 Mugshots

A photo gallery of mugshots received from police in Southern …

Photos: Celebrities Busted!
Photos: Celebrities Busted!

Famous faces find out they aren't above the law.

Former city worker pleads no contest to fraudulent exchange
Former DPW worker pleads nolo to fraud

A former city of Providence employee pleaded no contest to a …

Wanted armed robbery suspect arrested
Wanted armed robbery suspect arrested

Police have apprehended fugitive wanted in an armed robbery …

Providence assault case may face delays
CT assault charge may impact RI case

Attorney General Peter Kilmartin said a pending case in another…

Conn. man: Suspect assaulted us in past
Conn. man: Suspect assaulted us in past

Tory Lussier, 24, is accused of attacking and critically …

Purple Heart stolen from home of Marine KIA
Purple Heart stolen from Marine's home

Thieves broke into the family's New Bedford home over the …

Advertisement

Media company wants Bulger's records

Keeping records from public violates amendment

Updated: Friday, 06 Jul 2012, 3:58 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 06 Jul 2012, 3:58 PM EDT

BOSTON (AP) -- A federal magistrate judge in Boston is scheduled to hear arguments from a media company seeking access to records in the government's case against mobster James "Whitey" Bulger.

Authorities nabbed the 82-year-old Bulger in June 2011 in California after he spent 16 years on the run. Prosecutors say he had a role in 19 slayings, beginning in the 1970s when he was a top FBI informant.

The Boston Globe is seeking to defeat a 2011 protective order restricting disclosure of government discovery materials.

The company argues that keeping the public from getting information about Bulger without showing it poses a threat to his fair trial rights violates the First Amendment.

The defense agreed with the order last year, but now wants it lifted, saying it's "unconstitutionally overbroad."
 


Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. Please comment on the subject of the story itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Keep it civil, folks!

Our commenting section is powered by IntenseDebate. If you registered for an account but didn't receive a verification e-mail, check your spam folder or click here for more information. For additional technical help, click here.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Site Tools